morfizm (morfizm) wrote,
morfizm
morfizm

Want FreeNAS+ZFS as a home server? Think twice.

FreeNAS+ZFS summary (vs WHS) -- assuming you want to approach 1GBit/sec seq read/write bandwidth:

• Pro: RaidZ out of the box: software RAID with both redundancy and performance.
• Pro: software mirroring implemented with true read performance boost (forums say close to double but I haven't tested).
• Pro: It has end-to-end check-summing and auto-correction single read errors in RaidZ/RaidZ2 arrays. Periodic "scrubs" will just read the entire array, thus causing auto-correction if necessary.
• Pro: Encryption supported, encryption and compression are fast. (You should have strong CPU though. But you should have it regardless).

• Con: Overall ZFS is tuned for enterprise multi-user environment, and things like VMs and Oracle databases accessed straight from server. Be ready to discover more unwanted surprises for "a home server with a few users" scenarios. For any home-user-only feature request, FreeNAS developers will just laugh at you.
• Con: Server requires strong CPU. At least quad core with high clock. No micro servers.
• Con: Server requires plenty of ECC RAM. For 8T array, 16 GB is a minimum. (+$180).
• Con: Doesn't do defrag, and it does copy on write. It's compensated with necessity for ZIL for write buffering and lowering IO sync impact, and L2ARC for cache and read-ahead.
    ○ Requires 3 small SSD drives (1 for L2ARC and 2 mirrored for ZIL). (+$150).
    ○ L2ARC SSD shouldn't be very large - or pay with significant ARC space (ECC RAM) to keep metadata. Metadata to data ratio is 1/45 (120GB disk will require 2.7GB of RAM).
• Con: Allows upgrading disks but only lets you use extra space once ALL disks in array were upgraded (min size used).
• Con: You can boot the OS from USB drive. Any other options aren't really supported. 2.5GB is used and other flash space is unusable by design. Upside: easy to upgrade (you can export config and just plug an updated thumb drive).
• Con: Encryption require manual intervention to unlock the drive (or do some scripting, be careful with security).
• Con: You aren't supposed to run your own arbitrary extra server-type jobs on FreeNAS (pain in the ass to configure and maintain).
• Con: You should have >30% of free space or performance will suck.
• Con: Samba/CIFS support for Windows shares are very slow on metadata reads (list directory). Use NFS. Windows understands NFS (haven't tested NFS yet).
• Con: Permissions are pain in the ass to configure.
• Con: NTFS is not fully compatbile. I observed loss of ChangeTime and loss of one decimanal place in LastWrite, LastAccess and CreateTime. This may cause trouble with sync tools like robocopy.
• Con: Server backup with rotating disks is difficult to configure (not yet done). Volume snapshotting can help with incremental backup scenario when you want to recover accidentally deleted files from server.
• Con: Deduplication is possible but requires 5GB of ECC RAM per 1TB of data (not sure dedupped or source, but I hope dedupped).
• Con: No "client backup" solution out of the box, you should use something else (e.g., again, WHS :)). However, if you use dedup, you can just do periodic full image backups or rsync your client drives. You'll lose perf benefit of "incremental" though, but preserve some space benefit.
Tags: 1, devices, in english, software
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 2 comments